Sunday, 31 July 2016

The Cell Phone-Brain Cancer Connection: Should You Worry?

Image result for Cell Phone-BrainA new study in the journal 'BMJ' says there's no evidence of a link between cell phone use and the development of brain tumors. But some previous studies suggest otherwise. Who's right?

:v Good news: There is no link between long-term use of cell phones and increased risk of brain tumors - at least according to research just published in the British journal BMJ. In what is being described as the “biggest ever” study on the subject, scientists in Denmark reviewed data on the entire Danish population age 30 and older and born in the country after 1925, which included nearly 360,000 cell phone users, over an 18-year period. After comparing rates of cancer of the brain and central nervous system between long-term cell phone users and non-users, they found no evidence of increased cancer risk, even among people who had been using their phones for more than 13 years.

The results are certainly reassuring, but are they right?

The Debate Over Cell Phones and Cancer

This new study is just the latest loop in the cell phone-cancer roller coaster: Previous research on the subject is extensive - and conflicting. In 2006, for example, Swedish scientists announced that an hour of daily cell phone use over the course of a decade could increase a person’s risk for developing brain cancer by as much as 240 percent. But earlier that same year, British researchers who collected data on cell phone users found no such link - to any type of cancer.

That’s just one example of the mixed messages we’re getting from cell phone-cancer research. In the last nine months alone, there have been at least five studies or reports related to the effects of cell radiation on brain tumor growth, each contradicting or complicating the results of a study that came before.

In February, British researchers at the University of Manchester released data that found that mobile phones were not likely to increase the risk of brain tumors, as there had been no significant change in the number of cancer cases diagnosed since cell phones were introduced. Four days later, scientists at the U.S. National Institutes of Health published a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which found that brain activity was higher in the areas closest to a phone’s antenna, although whether the effect was good or bad was unclear.

Then, in May, a World Health Organization (WHO) panel officially classified cell phones as “possibly carcinogenic” - the same category that includes the pesticide DDT and gasoline engine exhaust. That announcement was followed by a June report in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine, which suggested that people who used their phones often and for 10 years or more were at higher risk for developing gliomas (a type of brain tumor). But a month later, in July, Swiss researchers released results of a study that found that cell phone use did not pose a cancer threat to children, who are generally thought to be most at risk.

Confused? You’re not alone.

Cell Phones and Cancer: Should You Be Concerned?

The fact is, even experts can’t seem to come to any definitive conclusions. In each of the aforementioned studies, the authors noted that although their results were accurate, their conclusions were not likely to end the debate over whether cell phones cause brain tumors. In fact, the only thing everyone can agree on is that more research is needed. “[The results] must be put into the context of the 15 or so previous studies on mobile telephones and cancer,” Anders Alhbom, PhD, and Maria Feychting, PhD, MD, professors at the Institute of Environmental Medicine in Sweden, write in an accompanying editorial for the latest Danish study. “Evidence is reassuring, but continued monitoring of health registers is still warranted.”

“You have to look at a wide range of patients and people,” says Rahul Jandial, MD, PhD, a neurosurgeon at City of Hope in Duarte, Calif. “When you’re looking at statistics, you don’t always find conclusive results right away.” Complicating matters, he adds, is the fact that a lot of these studies are looking at different types of tumors (not just cancerous growths in the brain), so results are bound to be mixed. His personal belief, however, is that cell phones are safe - an idea which he says science seems increasingly to support.

Cell phones emit radiofrequency energy (radio waves), a form of non-ionizing radiation similar to the kind microwave ovens give off - but different from the ionizing type emitted by X-rays and CT scans, which is known to be dangerous. Evidence shows that prolonged or frequent exposure to ionizing radiation causes DNA damage in cells, which can eventually lead to cancer, but research is not as conclusive about whether non-ionizing radiation has the same effect.

“I think only time will tell,” says Ann Louise Gittleman, author of the book Zapped: Why Your Cell Phone Shouldn't Be Your Alarm Clock and 1,268 Ways to Outsmart the Hazards of Electronic Pollution. “And when we do have the definitive data, it probably will be too late.”

Gittleman, a former “cell phone junkie” who changed her habits after she developed a benign tumor in her parotid (salivary) gland, acknowledges the impressive size of the Danish study, but says what we really need is long-term data about the biological effects of chronic and cumulative radiation, particularly as this new generation of cell phone-exposed children and teens transitions into adulthood. The majority of the evidence we have now says that cell phones are not a risk - but just 60 years ago, Gittleman points out, people believed that cigarettes were safe too.

Dr. Jandial, for one, isn’t concerned. In fact, he thinks future research will only reinforce the idea that cell phones are harmless. “We haven’t seen any effect over the last two decades,” he explains. “The total number of brain tumors has remained basically the same as cell phone use has skyrocketed.”

What You Can Do About Cell Phone Radiation

In any case, both Jandial and Gittleman say that you should view all research on the subject cautiously. They also note that it can’t hurt to take steps to minimize your exposure to radiation. Which is not to say that you should abandon your phone or that you should live in constant fear of using it. Cell phones are a major part of modern life: A recent survey of more than 500 people in the U.S. found that many users would rather give up sex, exercise, caffeine, and even toothbrushes than not have their phones for a week. It’s unrealistic — and unnecessary — to try to eliminate your cell phone use completely. But there are steps you can take to make your current usage safer.

Easy Ways to Reduce Your Cell Phone Cancer Risk

“People are not going to go without technology,” Gittleman says. “We’re not going to go backward. But in order to go forward, we need to be proactive about protecting ourselves.”

Here, 10 tips from Gittleman and Jandial to minimize exposure to radiation from your cell phone:


  • Limit the frequency and length of calls. Keep cell phone calls as short as possible. If the conversation starts to drag on, hang up and call back from a landline.
  • Don’t have a landline? Get one. If you know you’re going to be having a lot of hours-long heart-to-hearts with your mom or your best friend, use a landline — preferably one that isn’t cordless. Gittleman says that there’s some research that indicates cordless phones may be emit even more radiation than cell phones. “It’s almost like having a mini cell phone tower in your home,” she explains. “One study showed that cordless phones caused heart rate and arrhythmias to increase.”
  • Don’t chat in cars, trains, or elevators. Your phone has to work a lot harder to get signal out through the metal, so it emits stronger electromagnetic radiation, Gittleman explains. Also, if you’re using your phone in a metal container, the frequency waves it emits have nowhere to go and instead bounce back and forth in the space around you, exposing you to more-than-usual radiation. Going at high speeds (such as in a train) also automatically boosts the power of the signal to maximize the phone’s attempts to connect to a new relay antennae, Gittleman explains. More power equals more radiation.
  • Only use your phone when you have a full signal. When you have poor reception, your phone has to work harder to connect, which increases the strength of the electromagnetic radiation it gives off. Don’t try to make calls when your bars are low, and if the signal goes bad mid-conversation, hang up and try again later.
  • Use a headset or speaker mode. Gittleman suggests using an air tube headset, which is less conductive of radio frequency than regular wired headsets and also keeps the phone further away from your head.
  • Get text savvy. Take a cue from your kids. “Younger people tend to text more, which is a good habit,” Dr. Jandial says. Texting requires less battery power and less signal strength to connect, so your phone doesn’t emit as much radiation as when you’re talking. Plus, any radiation that is released is further away from your brain.
  • Hold the phone away from your head. Putting a phone up to your ear is “almost like using a mini microwave oven on your brain,” Gittleman says. Whenever possible, keep the phone at least 6 to 7 inches from your skull — including when it’s on but not in use. (Don’t sleep with it next to your pillow if you use it as an alarm clock.)
  • Keep your battery charged. Low battery power makes it difficult for your phone to find a signal, so you’re likely to have poor reception and be exposed to more radiation.
  • Switch sides regularly during conversation. Spread out your exposure to any radiation by alternating which side of your head is closest to your phone. This helps to ensure that no one part of your brain gets an unusually high dose.

Are You A Toilet Texter?

A new survey reveals 75 percent of Americans with mobile phones use them in the bathroom. Most wash their hands, but their phones? Not so much. Beyond No. 1 and No. 2, find out what people are dialing into on the commode.

Image result for Toilet TexterIf you answered yes, you’re not alone. You’re actually part of the norm. A new survey of 1,000 Americans with mobile phones found that 75 percent use them in the bathroom.

The survey results, compiled by the agency 11mark, are pretty germy. Among people between the ages 19 and 35, the stat jumps to 91 percent. While 92 percent of people surveyed claimed to wash their hands after using the bathroom, only 14 percent wash their phones.


So what are people doing, exactly, with their phones on the toilet? According to the survey results, reading texts and answering a phone call (what?!) were the top tasks, followed by sending texts, reading emails, and initiating phone calls (again — what?). A small group of the respondents, 10 percent, said they’ve made online purchases. Talk about multitasking!

Men reported greater attachment to their phones than women. Browsing the web ranked top toilet-to-do among the guys, followed by answering work-related phone calls. Think about that next time you’re on a conference call.

Maybe it’s not a lack of hand-washing but overuse of phones on the loo to blame for the high number of cell phones in Britain (one in six) thought to be contaminated with fecal matter.

In that case, smart phone use on toilet may not be so smart.

If you just can’t help but stay connected, at least make an effort to disinfect your trusty communication device. A little rubbing alcohol can go a long way. Just look up cleaning instructions for your particular phone first. If you break it, what will you do in the bathroom?

Time to fess up: Do you bring your phone into the bathroom to text, shop, or read? Tell us!

What Are Kidney Stones?

Woman experiencing pain from a kidney stone.

There are several different types of kidney stones, but each of them can cause a lot of pain.

Kidney stones are small chunks of solid material that can form in your kidneys, a pair of organs that filter your blood.

The "stones," which are usually yellow and brown, vary in size and shape.

For instance, some may be jagged and as small as a grain of sand, while others may be lumpy and the size of golf balls.

A stone may stay in the kidney or travel down the urinary tract — the body's waste and excess-water drainage system — and get stuck, causing severe pain in the belly or side of the back.

Other symptoms may include nausea, chills, and blood in the urine.

Prevalence and Demographics of Kidney Stones

Kidney stones are one of the most common disorders of the urinary tract, resulting in more than a million visits to health care providers and 300,000 emergency room visits each year in the United States, according to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK).
About one in 11 people in the United States, or 8.8 percent of the population, have had a kidney stone, according to a 2012 report in the journal European Urology.

Kidney stones affect both men and women, though struvite stones are more common in women and uric acid stones are more common in men.

Overall, however, the prevalence of kidney stones is higher in men than women.

Kidney stones are also more common in obese people than non-obese people, and less common in non-Hispanic African and Mexican-Americans than in non-Hispanic Caucasians, according to the European Urology study.

Image result for KidneyWhat Are the Kidneys?

Part of the urinary system, your two kidneys are fist-sized, bean-shaped organs, located just below the rib cage, one on each side of the spine.

They have a number of important functions, mainly filtering the blood to remove waste and excess water, resulting in the formation of urine, which is stored in the bladder and emptied from the body through the urethra.

The kidneys also:
Balance the body's levels of electrolytes, including sodium, potassium, and phosphate, to maintain the body's balance of acids and bases
Produce hormones involved in regulating blood pressure, producing red blood cells, and maintaining bone strength
Prevent the buildup of waste and fluid in the body

Development of Kidney Stones

Kidney stones develop when the concentration of normal kidney substances (especially calcium, oxalate, and phosphorus) increases substantially.

This process — sometimes known as nephrolithiasis — can be due to various factors, including low fluid intake, diet, or medications such as diuretics and calcium-based antacids.

A number of issues can increase a person's risk of developing kidney stones, including:

  • A family history of kidney stones
  • Medical conditions that affect the levels of urinary substances
  • Urinary tract blockage
  • Digestive problems
  • Recurrent urinary tract infections


Types of Kidney Stones

There are four main types of kidney stones: calcium, uric acid, struvite, and cystine stones.

  • Calcium stones, of which there are two forms — calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate — are the most common type of kidney stone.In most cases, calcium oxalate stones form from high levels of calcium and oxalate in urine.But if there are high levels of urine calcium and the urine is alkaline (has a high pH), calcium phosphate stones may form instead.
  • Uric acid stones develop from overly acidic (low pH) urine.This can result from a diet high in purines, substances that are broken down to form uric acid and are found in high concentrations in animal protein.
  • Struvite stones, sometimes called infection stones, are made of magnesium, ammonium, and phosphate, and typically form in alkaline urine.They develop from upper urinary tract infections, including kidney infections, when bacteria produce urease, an enzyme that helps convert urea (a compound in urine) into ammonia and other products.
  • Cystine stones result from a genetic disorder that causes cystine, an amino acid, to leak into the urine from the kidneys.